Synopsis IMDBA naked girl is filmed passing through a gallery of paintings, reminding us of the difference between the plasticity of painting and a body moving in an open space.Synopsis TMDBIt is quite revealing how complex the simple form is. Shot one to one, a girl is confronted with nothing more than her thoughts. In the period of watching her (while she is looking at you) her expressions and movements turn into a 'mirror' for the viewer to experience his or herself. The experience is solely emotive between you and her, and occurs in "real" time. (Stephen Dwoskin)Synopsis OMDB"Girl" may be interesting to the "artsy" crowd (as this is obviously supposed to be an "art" film) as they try to convince themselves that this is good, but that's all in their own imaginations. "Girl" is pretty much nothing but a girl standing on a small rug in what looks like a slum apartment looking into the camera. Obviously, it's not easy to just stand there, so she squirms a bit, wiggles a little, even squats down halfway through, I supposed to not bore herself to death too quickly. Finally she sits down on the rug for good and it's all over.I'd like to think that this film is just a way to punk the artsy crowd, making them contemplate what it all means, when in reality, it all means absolutely nothing. Even though the film is marked as a 1975 film, the end credit shows 1971.
D 16720.3
